TaxConnections

"A World of Tax Help in One Click"

Opinion Avatar

Welcome to Worldwide Tax Blogs

You can find your favorite Tax Bloggers by World Region / Author / Category / Recent Posts. If you would like to publish your Tax Blog on TaxConnections, submit your request to taxblog@taxconnections.com.

2013 Finance Act – Part 3 – Irish Tax System

This is a ten-part Worldwide Tax Blog Series on a cross section of amendments in the Irish Tax System and a general overview:

Universal Social Charge – Part 1
The Remittance Basis for Income Tax – Part 2
The Remittance Basis for Capital Gains Tax – Part 3
Taxation of certain Social Welfare Benefits – Part 4
Mortgage Interest Relief – Part 5
Donations to approved bodies – Part 6
Farm Restructuring Relief – Part 7
FATCA – The US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act – Part 8
Close Company Surcharge – Part 9
Stamp Duty – Part 10

_____________________________________________________________________________________

3. THE REMITTANCE BASIS FOR CAPITAL GAINS TAX

As with the Income Tax legislation, this new subsection provides that where an Irish resident, non-domiciled individual makes a transfer outside the state, of any chargeable gains, which would otherwise have been liable to Capital Gains Tax on the remittance basis, to his/her spouse or civil partner, any amounts remitted into Ireland on or after 13th February 2013 deriving from that transfer will be treated as having been remitted by the individual who made the transfer to his/her spouse or civil partner.

It is important to remember that the provisions apply to a remittance by the spouse or civil partner on or after 13th February 2013 which means that any chargeable gains historically transferred are within the scope of the new provisions of Finance Act 2013 where the remittance into Ireland occurs on or after 13th February 2013.

Unreported Bank Account In Singapore? Time Is Running Out

There are tens of thousands of Americans with offshore accounts, many of them in Singapore. As the fourth largest banking center, Singapore has become a popular tax haven for people trying to hide money from the government. That is about to change, however. If you have a bank or other financial account there and have not been filing FBARs with the IRS, watch out!

According to a Reuters article, banks in Singapore face an internal deadline of July 1st to identify and report accounts where there is a strong suspicion of tax evasion. Singapore is taking this action in anticipation of new U.S. and European reporting measures.

Owning a foreign account is not illegal under U.S. law as long as the account is properly reported. The Bank Secrecy Act requires American taxpayers (including dual nationals and resident alien “green card” holders) to annually file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (or FBAR for short.) Failure to file an FBAR carries the potential for huge civil penalties and even a chance of criminal prosecution and prison.

Although taxpayers are required to file FBARs annually, many do not. Sometimes, it is simply ignorance of the law. That often happens with immigrants and dual nationals who think they do not need to report if simply sending money “home.” Other times, taxpayers intentionally use offshore accounts as a way of evading taxes or dodging creditors. Read more

IRS Criminal Investigation Annual Report

IRS Criminal Investigation (CI) released its Annual Report for fiscal 2012.

Investigations initiated (5,125) and prosecution recommendations were both up in fiscal 2012 compared to the prior year. Filings of indictments and other charging documents rose 13 percent. Meanwhile, convictions and those sentenced both gained roughly 12 percent (2,634) from 2011.  The Service was able to convict on 93% of the files opened. The 28-page report summarizes a wide variety of IRS CI activity on a range of tax related issues during the year ending Sept. 30, 2012.

Noticeably absent from the report is the concept that perhaps CI should have been investigating the Exempt Organizations function of the IRS.

Musings On IRS Scandal

The scandal involving the IRS and politically targeted audits has been well covered by mainstream media. I wasn’t even going to write about it but for three emails received from past and present clients. The details of the present scandal are fairly easy to summarize:

1) The IRS targeted conservative and “Tea Party” aligned groups for audit;

2) The IRS lied about the audits when confronted by Congress;

3) People very high up in the IRS knew what was going on; and

4) The Treasury Inspector General still has not figured out who ordered the audits or “special treatment.”

I won’t belabor those points. Look no further than the New York Times for some excellent reporting. What we will try to do, however, is discuss the rest of the story. (Pay attention Senator Warren!)

First, the IRS has software that can track who accessed tax records of the political and social elite. How do I know? I was Maine’s state revenue commissioner between 1995 and 1998 when that technology was first rolled out. A couple key strokes and IRS management can tell what employee accessed the tax return of the Obamas, David Koch, Elizabeth Warren or the Tea Party. In fact, if I were them, I would want to know who was snooping around and if the person snooping was directed to do so. (Every search is tied to an employee ID number.) Read more

2013 Finance Act – Part 2 – Irish Tax System

Finance Act 2013 contains the legislative provisions for a number of changes to the Irish tax system under all the main tax heads including Income Tax, Corporation Tax, Capital Gains Tax, Excise, Value Added Tax, Stamp Duty and Capital Acquisitions Tax.

Due to the amount of changes it is not possible to detail each individual provision so I decided to focus on a cross section of amendments to give a general overview.  The legislative provisions I have selected will have an affect on most if not all Irish individuals whether resident and domiciled or resident and non-domiciled; employed or unemployed; retired or still working; self employed or PAYE workers; corporate structures or individuals, etc.  This is a ten-part Worldwide Tax Blog Series:

Universal Social Charge – Part 1
The Remittance Basis for Income Tax – Part 2
The Remittance Basis for Capital Gains Tax – Part 3
Taxation of certain Social Welfare Benefits – Part 4
Mortgage Interest Relief – Part 5
Donations to approved bodies – Part 6
Farm Restructuring Relief – Part 7
FATCA – The US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act – Part 8
Close Company Surcharge – Part 9
Stamp Duty – Part 10

_____________________________________________________________________________________

2. THE REMITTANCE BASIS FOR INCOME TAX

This legislative amendment was introduced as an anti-avoidance measure to ensure that an individual who is resident and/or ordinarily resident in Ireland but non-domiciled cannot avoid paying the correct tax on the remittance of income into Ireland. Read more

First Drones… Now Robo Audits

In its continuing quest to collect more taxes, the IRS is targeting small business. For the past several years, individuals instead of being audited by a live human being, are being audited by computer and unresponsive mail audits. In order to get more money, the IRS is expanding this secret surveillance to audit small businesses. By using the Robo audits, the IRS can attack more small businesses, and attempt to collect more money.

The way this works is the IRS uses many of its matching computer information documents. For example, if you are a restaurant business and tips are put on credit card receipts, the IRS will track those tips, determine an average percentage and apply that as additional wages to your employees. This way they can collect more taxes from the employer in the form of 941 employment taxes, and they can also go after the employee to collect more income tax.

The problem with these audits is that there is no educated human being to speak to concerning the issues. Typically the IRS proposes an absurdly large amount of tax due by disallowing many of the proper deductions taken by the business and inflating the gross receipts. It sends a bill to the taxpayer and the taxpayer has a short period of time, 90 days, to file its case in US Tax Court. If not, the taxpayer is stuck having to try to come up with this huge amount of tax and infighting and expensive battle in the US Court of Federal Claims. Read more