Tax Question Of The Week: Who Knows The Answer?

During the final stages of an IRS Appeals Level of an OIC, I then received an audit for my 2015 corporate tax return. My personal side was settled and a figure agreed upon( took two years to get to this status). My question is “Does this mean that my OIC already negotiated will have to withdrawn?”

Is the OIC withdrawn automatically in Appeals? Are the Auditors attempting to take away the negotiated OIC and I have no choice in the matter? Is there any part of the code section that would tell me how this is handled. I am unable to find it and the lawyer representing me is unable to find any code section to protect an already negotiated OIC settlement.

Please leave your comments below.

 

Kat Jennings, TaxConnections, CEO and Founder and Advisory Team provides three areas of services: 1) Internationally recognized, retained executive search services for multinational corporations, public accounting firms, and law firms; 2) Introductions of sellers to buyers of small and medium size accounting firms; and 3) Provide brand building and education services that support and prepare accounting firm owners to buy/sell an accounting practice. We focus on educating the journey to sell a practice and how to increase firm revenue prior to any sale. Our program ensures you start years prior to a sale by learning what is expected of you during the selling process, and introducing firm Partners to cross selling opportunities that are easy to implement and reduce your workload at the same time. We introduce you to value added connections to smartly grow revenue in your accounting practice.

Kat Jennings has been retained by organizations worldwide to locate tax professionals with highly specialized tax knowledge and expertise. She has a thorough understanding of the tax business community, with a proven record of stellar performances matching professionals with organizations. Bringing two parties together to work successfully is the art of understanding personalities, cultural fit, expectations by both parties, flexible or inflexible work environments, understanding what drives and motivates each party, and revolves around the personality and ethics of each executive team.

Kat is a widely recognized expert in high level, tax executive search, as well as connecting buyers and sellers of accounting firms. TaxConnections provides and educates small to medium size accounting firms owners and Partners how to prepare and sell their firms so they can build a succession plan for their retirement. With larger firms seeking to acquire smaller accounting practices, there is a real need to help firm owners prepare to be acquired. Most firm owners are unaware they are not ready to sell when they decide to retire. TaxConnections educates firm owners’ what they need to do years in advance of selling an accounting firm practice.
Senior tax executives expect the utmost privacy when being introduced to multinational organizations about a new tax opportunity under consideration. Having said that, companies searching for a new head of tax expecting tax executive candidates to submit their resume through a resume portal, will never see a full slate of outstanding tax executives available due to a candidates’ desire for greater privacy. This is why privacy focused Uber Tax Recruiters consistently outperform in-house recruiters on tax executive searches.

We offer our clients a Performance Retainer Agreement arrangement so their HR department can still recruit and compete with the tax candidates we present on Head of Tax searches. The client pays us a partial fee upfront, and if they find a candidate they deem better than we introduce to them, we forfeit the final fee. Most of the time, they love and prefer our private introductions to tax executive candidates better than what they source through their own resume portals.

When we represent selling/buying small to medium-sized firms, firm owners/partners also demand greater privacy when considering the sale of their practice. TaxConnections provides a safe place to discuss their business needs, elevate their practices’ online reputation, and increase revenue through new streams of business development by outsourcing work and partnering with other firms. Over three decades, we have worked tirelessly to build relationships between firm owners most organizations rarely have access to in the world of tax. There are numerous possibilities you may never have considered previously to bolster the value of your practice and service offerings.

As a globally recognized consultant to multinational organizations, accounting firms, and law firms searching for tax expertise, Kat has been retained by public accounting firms, law firms, and corporations worldwide including Apple Computer, AC Neilson, Accenture, Agilent Technologies, Allergan, Alza, American Express, American Media, Aon, Baker & McKenzie, Barclays Bank, Bechtel, Cargill, Carl Zieuss Vision, Century Aluminum, Chevron, Clorox, Citigroup, Commercials Metals, Constellation Energy, Countrywide, Del Monte, Deloitte Touche, DFS, DLA Piper, E&J Gallo Winery, Electronic Arts, Ernst &Young, Fox Entertainment, Fremont Investments, General Electric,General Motors, Herbalife, Hewlett Packard, Hyatt, Intel, Jones Lang LaSalle, Kimco Realty, KLA Tencor, Koch Industries, KPMG, Levi Strauss, Liberty Mutual, LKQ, Loews, Logitech, Lucas Film, Maersk, McKesson, Nalco, Newell Rubbermaid, Nissan, Oracle, Orbitax, Pacific Gas & Electric, PwC, QAD, SAIC, SanDisk, Sanmina, Sempra Energy, SONY, Synopsys, Ticketmaster, Trimble Navigation, Toyota, Univar, Wal-Mart, Wells Fargo, Vertex, Yahoo, Xilinx, and many more not listed here.
Contact Kat at 858,999.0053 Office/858.232.4415 Cell or kat@taxconnections.com to request a private consultation regarding the sale of your practice, adding top talent to your organization, or merging your practice with another firm owner with a book of business. The possibilities are endless; if you have a dream of a new vision for your professional life; we will scout opportunities throughout the market to make it happen.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google+ Flickr YouTube Vimeo    

Subscribe to TaxConnections Blog

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.



5 comments on “Tax Question Of The Week: Who Knows The Answer?

  • Benjamin F Mathews

    We need to know the Form of the Corporation. It it a Sub S or an 1120?

    If it’s a Sub S, the OIC may be withdrawn.

  • TaxConnections has many people who contact us for help with tax questions and referrals to our tax members. This is the first of weekly questions that have come in from our site visitors we are putting out to our community. Thsu particular gentlemen told us his tax lawyer could find the code section that covers this issue. Do you know the answer?

  • I like Ben’s answer though it is possible that an audit of an S-corp will still result in a no change. I would not be concerned about it as you should have time to complete the offer payment terms before the audit is done and if you can pay off the audit year liability when it is determined, it should have no effect on the offer.
    If you have a C-corp, it will have no effect. A corporation is its own person under the law and it is not you. Even if it owes, it does not impact you.

  • Benjamin,
    I just sent your answer on to our site visitor who submitted this question and asked him to comment and answer your question back. This was a challenging question where they could not find the answer. Very good job!

  • Not unless you want to withdraw it. A withdrawal is a voluntary action on your part. The IRS Settlement Officer could reject it but unless he or she brings up the subject just shut up and lie low. If the examination results in any deficiency you would have to pay it promptly to remain in compliance. If you don’t the offer would be defaulted and the liability resurrected.

    If you think there is likely be a deficiency and you know you don’t have the ability to pay it–after all the accepted offer should pretty much tap you out–you can make a case with the revenue agent that he or she should just close the case citing Internal Revenue Manual Section 4.20.1.2.1 (Examiner’s Responsibilities) which states: “Examiners should consider the overall collectibility of the return during the pre-contact phase as one of many factors in determining whether to survey the return or limit the scope and depth of examination.”

    IRS does not want to waste its time auditing an empty pocket if it doesn’t have to. I made this argument on a case recently where there was already $85,000 outstanding in currently not collectible status and the examiner, an obvious newby, argued that the purpose of the audit was to determine the correct tax. Stunned that I knew her manual better than she did, she took my request to her manager who told her to audit someone else instead. My client eventually submitted an offer for $3,000 which was accepted.

Comments are closed.